This Is Creepy
Posted by TRO on May 14, 2008
Posted in Brunettes, Hooters, Humor, Personal, Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Posted by TRO on May 14, 2008
Posted in Brunettes, Hooters, Humor, Personal, Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Posted by TRO on May 6, 2008
Are happening today. The Indiana and North Carolina Democratic primaries that is.
These are very important, big things, people. Seriously. They are very big and they are very important and you need to pay attention to them. Up close.
And from different angles.
And try to separate the fake.
From the real.
Because real is better.
Much, much better.
*** I should note that I don’t think either one of the candidates running in the Democratic primary are real. But the post doesn’t work without the fake or real thing so cut me some slack.
Posted in 2008 election, Brunettes, Hooters, Politics, Women | No Comments »
Posted by TRO on April 11, 2008
Well, if not the language of “love,” certainly the language of “I’d hit that.”
Via Frogsmoke.
Posted in Blondes, Brunettes, France, Funny Foreign Customs, Hooters, Popular Culture, Sex, Television, Videos, Women | No Comments »
Posted by TRO on April 4, 2008

A Greenville, S.C., woman who filed a lawsuit against Victoria’s Secret saying that a defective bra seriously cut one of her breasts has submitted a new version of the suit correcting an error in the depth of the wound, Greenville Online reported.
In the original lawsuit, Jessica Lang claimed a bra she bought at the mall “malfunctioned” and caused a cut in her chest and breast “nearly six inches wide and six inches deep.” The new claim, filed Thursday, drastically changes that allegation to “3 inches long by 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring,” Greenville Online reported.
Lang’s attorney, Nathan Hughey, says the mistake was a result of a clerical error in a legal document when the lawsuit was originally filed in 2005. It has since been moved from state to federal court. Victoria’s Secret claims no wrongdoing in the alleged injury. They say Lang’s injuries were caused by her own negligence.
Lang claims she was fired from Alegis Group in Greenville after she had to miss work to recover from the bra-induced injury. Hughey told Greenville Online that the bra “broke and the wire came through and lacerated her breast.”
The lawsuit claims that Victoria’s Secret “so negligently and carelessly designed, manufactured, constructed, assembled, inspected, and sold the brassiere that it was dangerous and unsafe for its intended uses” and caused Lang “lost wages, pain and suffering, future disability, loss of prospective business relations and medical expenses.”
The thing that has me curious about this whole story is exactly how such an injury would result in a “loss of prospective business relations.” That is a business I would like explained to me in great detail. By the brunette in the picture. Over some drinks and in a dark discrete place.
Oh yes, the picture has nothing to do with the story. She’s just hot.
Here’s the thing . . . as one gets older one learns that everyday bras are not the dangerous kind. Much like tame house cats, they rarely cause problems except for unsightly sagging as they age. It’s the wild, exotic bras that cause you trouble. Sure, they start out cute and cuddly but, much like women in their late-30s, 40s and 50s, when they are full-grown cougars you never know what they will do. It’s a recipe for a trip to the emergency room, traction, and stitches I tell ya.
Posted in Consumer Products, Hooters, Lingerie, News, Popular Culture, Women | 4 Comments »
Posted by TRO on March 14, 2008

1. Welcome to the preview of a Democratic president and congress and say hello to higher taxes. But the money will be for the children, right?
2. Welcome to the world of the Pastor of Barack Hussein and Michelle Obama, a man who is Obama’s acknowledged “spiritual mentor” for 20 years, married the couple, baptized their kids and who’s sermon titled “Audacity of Hope” was the inspiration for Obama’s book of the same name:
Nope, he’s not Obama, but you know darn well that people don’t belong to churches for decades unless they believe what the pastor and the rest of the congregation believes. If they don’t, they leave for other churches. It’s science (not to get into a whole faith/science debate here). And by the way. He raised his kids in this church listening to this crap. What kind of people do that? How good is his raved-about judgement if he does that? And to make things worse - he simply will not dump the guy. He downplays it and says he doesn’t agree but then makes excuses for this racist while at the same time playing the race card on anyone who criticises him about anything. This isn’t the way a man who is supposed to be a “race healer, not a race warrior” should act.
3. Speaking of science - sort of anyway - the founder of the Weather Channel is suing Al Gore for fraud over scam that is global warming. Sweet.
4. Anti-war reporting is helping Iraqi insurgents. Well, duhhh. This war has without a doubt been more difficult, costly, and lasted longer due to the main stream media’s concentration on bad news and anti-war rhetoric rather than good news (of which there has been plenty), pro-American stories, and tales of our many heroes over there. There are so many people here in America who should be ashamed for supporting out enemies this way. Despite this bombardment of bad news, it appears that only 18 percent of Americans think we should withdraw immediately from Iraq. Wow. Americans really do prefer winning over losing.
5. The Tennessee flying saucer house. I’ve seen it in person. It’s pretty cool.
6. Man celebrates his 100th birthday at Hooters. Viva Viagra!
7. More Obama news. Seems he got $1,000,000 in earmarks for the Chicago hospital where his wife is Vice President of Community Affairs. At a sweet salary of $316,962 which is an increase from $121,910 just before her husband was elected to the Senate. Coincidence, I am sure. I’m also sure they are she is worth every penny.
8. And what about that Al Quaeda - Saddam connection? You know the one that Democrats say never existed and Republicans say did, but have been hard-pressed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? Well, it looks like there was one after all.
Captured Iraqi documents have uncovered evidence that links the regime of Saddam Hussein to regional and global terrorism, including a variety of revolutionary, liberation, nationalist and Islamic terrorist organizations. While these documents do not reveal direct coordination and assistance between the Saddam regime and the al Qaeda network, they do indicate that Saddam was willing to use, albeit cautiously, operatives affiliated with al Qaeda as long as Saddam could have these terrorist-operatives monitored closely. Because Saddam’s security organizations and Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contacting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a “de facto” link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam’s use of terrorist tactics and his support for terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime.
There’s no “smoking gun” in this report, but as a criminal and counterintelligence investigator with 24 years experience I can tell you that most cases are made with circumstantial evidence not smoking guns. This is good stuff. There was a connection. Not that any Democrat is ever going to believe it, but there was a connection.
9. It keeps coming back to Obama. This time he voted against his own tax and spending bill. You know, the one he keeps campaigning on. Makes your head spin, I tell ya.
10. I don’t care who she is, no way I would pay this unless I get to play with those hooters. She would also have to promise not to talk all evening.
UPDATE:
To Number 2 above: Obama has now called Wright’s statements “inflammatory and appalling” and adds:
“Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy,” he said in the statement. “I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it’s on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue.”
Took him long enough. And I suppose I should take him at his word, but to be truthful I don’t believe him at all. He had to do this after all the race-cards he had been throwing at Hillary or he wouldn’t be able to throw anymore. Still, politically it lets the MSM off the hook as they can now call the incident over and move on to other things. They hated covering it, the little they did, and this means they concentrate on Hillary and McCain again.
Plus, his statement isn’t all it seems to be. Okay, maybe they are over-analyzing it, but hey, it’s not like he’s the only candidate that has been subject to analyzing. Then again, his distancing himself from Wright was predicted by the parties involved.
Posted in 2008 election, Anti-war Nuts, Blondes, Celebrities, Crazy Leftists, Elections, Global Warming, Hooters, Iraq war, It's science, Military, Obama, Parody, Political Correctness, Politics, Religion, Science, Sex, Videos, War, War on Terror, Women | No Comments »
Posted by TRO on March 6, 2008

This just proves my theory that women with big hooters can get away with anything.
Actress Serena Kozakura’s conviction for willful destruction of property has been overturned by the Tokyo High Court because her large breasts revealed flaws in the testimony against her.
Reconstruction during an appeal hearing of the 38-year-old actress’s alleged crime of breaking down the door in a man’s apartment showed her breasts prevented her from climbing through a door as the man testified she had done, casting doubt on his reliability.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Posted in Hooters, Women | No Comments »
Posted by TRO on February 6, 2008

Is certainly a good buy. Not a best buy . . . that would be a brunette . . . but you really are getting a lot for your money here. And who doesn’t love a bargin?
Hat-tip Blowing Smoke.
Posted in Brunettes, Hooters, Women | No Comments »
Posted by TRO on December 16, 2007
That’s what the gals of Ryan Air are trying to do for you. And here’s how.
Visiting the cockpit is not just for kids anymore. But where does she pin her wings?

Ladies and gentlemen, please pay attention to these important safety instructions.

And how’s this for an after-flight wash-up?

Bless their entrepreneur hearts.
Posted in Air Travel, Brunettes, Hooters, Women | No Comments »
Posted by TRO on December 1, 2007

If you want an explanation for my posting this besides the obvious chesty brunette surrounded by two chesty blondes and the lesbian fantasy theme, then here’s something.
The Picture is from the Movie “Blitzmädels an die Front”. It’s an old – and very strange – West German Movie about the bizarre life of women in the Third Reich. The story follows several girls and young women that gone to be Blitzmädels - Women that worked as support troops for the Wehrmacht, the Nazi Army. The Blitzmädels were not fighting soldiers but worked as secretaries and nurses. The Picture shows the girls at the sport training an qualification review…
Found this at Dark Roasted Blend.
Posted in Brunettes, Hooters, Women | No Comments »
Posted by TRO on November 17, 2007
Selma Hayek talking about how she got her breasts. Who say’s Catholicism doesn’t have its advantages?

Proof that miracles do indeed exist.
Via A Second Hand, who also talks about Harry Reid, but I lost interest once I saw Selma.
Posted in Brunettes, Celebrities, Hooters | 2 Comments »
Posted by TRO on November 16, 2007

This is medium-sized. The picture that is. I would have uploaded the large version, but I was worried you might poke your eyes out.
Hat-tip to Blowing Smoke, which is a very good movie, celeb, Hollywood blog, by the way. Check it out.
Posted in Brunettes, Celebrities, Hooters, Women | 1 Comment »
Posted by TRO on November 14, 2007

In a perfect world women’s hooters would just keep getting bigger.
Well, welcome to a perfect world.
High Street giant Marks & Spencer is to sell J-cup bras for the first time as customers demand larger sizes.
Its largest cup size was previously a G but M&S said there was a demand for the new, bigger garments.
The best-selling cup size at M&S is now 36C compared to 34B around five years ago.
The new size will be sold online first before deciding whether to put them in stores.
The chain’s head of lingerie design Soozie Jenkinson said: “We are seeing a larger proportion of younger women with larger cup sizes. That is the trend.”
Describing the J-cup bra, she added: “It is a small number within the market but there are definitely customers out there who are buying that size.”
A quarter of all the bras sold by M&S are now a DD cup or above, with double the amount being sold in these sizes compared to three years ago.
The chain is also developing more sports-orientated underwear to meet growing demand.
It is developing a new bra sold with a heart-rate monitor tucked into it.
Users can consult the monitor after doing exercise and remove it when the bra needs washing.
The M&S bra and heart-rate monitor pack is due to launch in February.
There’s more at the link.
I’m still a little pissed they didn’t follow-through on the flying car promise, but this kinda makes up for it.
Kinda.
Posted in Brunettes, Hooters, Women | 2 Comments »